CALIFORNIA'S ONLY SPORTSMAN'S NEWS SINCE 1953

Bill Karr's Blog

BILL KARR, Editor
Western Outdoor News, NorCal
California Guns & Hunting

Bill Karr has been full time staff with Western Outdoor Publications for 25 years now and was raised fishing and hunting, as well as managing, owning and building marshes and duck clubs. He's hunted archery and gun for mule deer, blacktail, whitetail, antelope, elk, wild pigs, grouse, pheasants, doves, ducks, geese, pigeons, crows, turkeys, rabbits and exotics around the United States, Mexico and Canada, and even run trap lines in the winter. Karr has been published in Outdoor Life, Field and Stream, many newspapers and had his photography published internationally. Karr is a Navy Vietnam-era veteran, past president of the Outdoor Writer’s Association of California (OWAC), member of the Outdoor Writers Association of America (OWAA), Professional Outdoor Media Association (POMA) and an inductee of the California Outdoors Hall of Fame. He has been awarded two Public Service Recognition Awards by the Outdoor Writers Association of California OWAC) for organizing and running the WON “Shoot for the Future” program and for the WON YOUTH OUTDOOR SPORTS FAIRS. He has served on the Youth Committee of the California Waterfowl Association, and as a member of the Advisory Committee to the California Department of Fish and Game, Game Bird Heritage Program.


Commercial fishing impact far greater than recreational
Recreational angling, under scientific laws and limits, has never detrimentally impacted a fishery that I am aware of in my decades of outdoor writing. I have been saying that for years and years, in particularly as more and more restrictions have been imposed on recreational fishermen in California and the nation — read that “Marine Life Preserves” that outlaw commercial and the family recreational fishermen.

How can anyone even compare a commercial fishery, where the goal is to “load the boat” with dead fish so they can be sold for a profit, to a couple of buddies out fishing in their boat, looking for a restrictive “limit” of fish for a fish fry?

Now, a report released by the American Sport­fishing Association (ASA) has shed light on another part of the recreational vs. commercial fishing comparison: Recreational fishing is just as important as commercial fishing from an economic standpoint, and has a much lower impact on the resource.

According to the report, recreational anglers landed just 2 percent of the total saltwater landings compared to 98 percent caught by the commercial fishing industry. And yet, saltwater landings by anglers contributed three times more to the national gross domestic product (GDP) than commercial landings! That is a striking difference!

That is also something that we in California have been trying to introduce into discussions with the folks who have been forming the Marine Protected Areas off our coast. But they haven’t listened, or paid any attention whatsoever, choosing to close off portions (the best fishing portions) of our coast to ALL fishing, recreational as well as commercial. That is just plain idiotic, but so have been all the actions by those who have formed the MPAs.

Those of us who love the Sea of Cortez and fishing out of the Baja have also been trying to convince officials in Mexico that they should NOT be issuing permits for huge commercial fishing operations in the Sea of Cortez, like Nombre 29, where the killing of every species is allowed under a so-called “shark fishing” permit. We’ve been arguing for decades that for every marlin or billfish killed for a few hundred dollars at the fish market is worth thousands and thousands to other Mexican businesses that support sport­fishermen. But so far, Mexico has ignored the pleas, except for some closures of Baja waters to all fishing (even recreational) in their Marine Parks. Which, again, makes no sense considering the small “take” of fish by recreational anglers.

So, back to the study: This analysis done by ASA compared NOAAs Recreational and Commercial Fishing Economic Date, May 2013, and NOAAs 2011 economic data, and found:

— Anglers landed just 2 percent of the total salt­water finfish compared to 98 percent by the commercial fishing industry.

— Saltwater landings by anglers contributed 3 times more to the national gross domestic product (GDP) than commercial landings.

 — The recreational sector added $152.24 in value added, or GDP, for 1 pound of fish, compared to the commercial sectors. $1.57 for a single pound of fish.

— In jobs, the recreational sector made up 455,000 jobs as compared to 381,000 commercial. For every 100,000 pounds landed, there were 210 recreational fishing jobs but only 4.5 jobs in the commercial fishing industry.

As they say in the study, this is not to demean commercial fishing, which is an important part of our economy and food source throughout the entire world. But more to point out that for marine areas that may need “protection” from overfishing, that can be done by eliminating the commercial anglers from an area, while still allowing recreational fishing, which provides a minimum of impact, and a huge benefit to the economy.

I hope that this study and others like it may prove valuable in over-riding the strident voices of anti-everything people who want to “save the trees,” “save the oceans,” “save the air” without any substantive information or basis.

Millions of dollars, thousands of animals, pets lost to coyotes
At the same time that animal-rights activists are pushing for restrictions on hunting coyotes in California, other states are stepping up efforts to try and keep coyote numbers under control, and even offering bounties on them.

karr_coyotesare
COYOTES ARE WILD animals that live by killing and eating their prey, and that includes your dogs and cats if they happen to be available. They are adaptable, and are getting braver in areas where humans pose no danger.

Why? Quite contrary to stories published in the Sacramento Bee and other media sources that no longer do their own research, information we received from the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) depict a story directly contrary to the ones in the Bee. Using the very same FOIA information that the anti-hunting groups used, but adding the information which they conveniently left out, we found the following:

— Losses from coyotes alone in California between 1995 and 2012 totaled an astounding $14,082,171 in reported losses. The verified losses were $10,874,008.

— Year-to-year verified losses have been increasing, from $298,526 in 2010, to $399,375 in 2011 and to $869,521 in 2012. Which means that losses from coyotes are increasing dramatically. Less control would mean more coyotes and more cost and destruction.

— Damage and death from coyotes includes birds, buildings, cattle, horses, fences, fowl, fruit, goats, health and safety (aviation and general), irrigation ditches and systems (including levees that protect homes from flooding), llamas, deer, melons, thousands of household pets like dogs and cats, rabbits, sheep, pigs and endangered species. When you see a local sign that says “Missing cat” or “Missing dog”, odds are it was killed by a coyote.

These figures came from U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Wildlife Services, which is in charge of responding to wildlife complaints. Without their work, monetary loss would be far greater, and many more household pets would be killed by coyotes every year.

Coyotes are highly adaptable and fit in well in urban areas, switching their main fare from wild game to pets like dogs and cats…and on occasion, even taking aim at children. For instance, on March 16 wildlife officials in Colorado killed two aggressive coyotes after the animals chased and bit a 5-year-old boy on a popular hiking trail in Boulder, Col.. The 5-year-old wasn’t alone—he was with his father and another 5-year-old. The two fearless coyotes surrounded the three and rushed them, biting the boy.

The incident followed a 4-week program of harassing and hazing coyotes in the Boulder area following a rash of coyote encounters in the area. That’s what happens when predators lose their fear of man — they consider them dinner. Coyotes, of course, cannot be hunted in or around Boulder, so they lost their fear of man.

karr_coyoteslive
COYOTES LIVE IN close conjunction with humans nowadays, killing their household pets and even threatening and occasionally attacking children and even adults.

The cycle of predators greatly controls the survival rates of “prey” species like deer, antelope, turkeys, quail, pheasants, rabbits, domestic animals and even pet dogs and cats. When you have an overabundance of coyotes, mountain lions, bobcats and possibly in the future — wolves — be prepared for California’s deer, elk, turkey, pheasant and rabbit populations to plummet even more.

Some dogs die during the course of predator control, an unfortunate side effect to the control measures, but the vast majority of them are feral dogs that many times run in packs and do as much, or more, damage, as coyotes and other predators. In fact, dogs that are running loose and unattended, if harassing livestock, may be killed on sight by the rancher or farmer. Responsible pet owners are aware of this, and keep strict control of their pets when in the outdoors.

The coyote populations in West Virginia and Utah have grown so out of control that they pose serious threats to livestock, agriculture and wildlife species, and they have grown beyond what government agencies can handle, so they are offering bounties to hunters to bring them in. In Utah, it’s a simple $50 per coyote, while West Virginia hunters can get $100 to $1000 for a coyote. Many other states offer cash or incentives for killing coyotes.

Animal-rights activists like to claim that a “balance” will occur if wildlife species are left alone. Simply not true, as even without man’s presence, wildlife species are very cyclical, with highs and lows as predator/prey species rise and fall. That means for a few years you may have lots of deer around and few predators, and then for a few years no deer at all, but a lot of predators. And as prey species decline, predators look for other food sources, such as domestic animals, dogs, cats and even humans.

Wildlife agencies in the states, and the nation, have chosen to try and maintain a balance between species, for the survival of all, and so that humans might experience the presence of them all. Part of maintaining that balance is through hunting, and millions of dollars spent on hunting licenses, clubs, ammunition, and private ranches, marshlands and preserves provide money for management, and habitat for species survival. Without hunting, that would all be lost.

It’s important for everyone to remember that “animal rights” activists, like the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), and many other assorted groups are not nearly as much concerned about the animals themselves, as they are to stop hunting.

To eliminate any part of hunting is to eliminate a method of wildlife management, and that is detrimental to wildlife populations. And to the people who enjoy wildlife.

If you’re interested in doing your own research instead of reading biased, one-sided stories by animal-rights activists, you can find out all about coyote damage and human/coyote conflicts and attacks by going to coyotebytes.org.

Tweetle-Dee, Tweetle DUMB results in lack of knowledge
It’s finally become pretty obvious to almost anyone who still keeps up on the news via in-depth coverage that Americans no longer spend much time or research on news-gathering, or in-depth study of topics or subjects, even those things of great importance to them. Our elections are certainly one good example.

In this age of Tweets, Twitters, Texting, Face Book, e-mail news blasts and short headline scans on the internet, the majority of people seem to feel they know all they need to know by looking at headlines and/or short news feeds. Apparently, they don’t feel they need to hear the details, or arguments pro and con, or both sides of a discussion.

Information overload has dumbed us all down, no question. Even very well-educated friends of mine no longer get a daily newspaper, relying on e-mail headlines and television for their news, apparently. Unfortunately, those don’t provide all the news that everyone should be aware of, and most certainly they no longer provide an unbiased view of both sides of an issue.

I’m downright scared about all of this, because people are making important decisions and expressing opinions without knowing all the facts about what they’re talking about or voting on! They are passing laws that will impact the country forever, and voting in legislators without any background checks, or even finding out what their voting records are!

Heck, here in California we keep voting back into office the most inefficient, self-absorbed, ignorant bunch of politicians I’ve ever seen! And I mean year-after-year! And all they do is spend money, tax everyone and pass laws with consequences they don’t even realize. I simply can’t understand why everyone keeps voting people like Boxer, Pelosi and Feinstein back into office every time when all they do is take away your liberties, tax you more and pass more laws governing your lives.

Where did our individuality and pride of self-sufficiency go? Why do you like being taxed, and being told what light bulb you have to use in your house, and what you can and can’t do?

I think perfect examples are the limited successes by the animal rights groups in restricting hunting opportunities and proper wildlife management. I know, I harp about this a lot, but bear with me, because it’s not just about shooting animals, it’s about wildlife management in general and the survival of various species in your own backyard. And something a lot of folks don’t think about: your own survival, protection of your home and lifestyle, and your livelihood.  

Did you know that varmints like muskrats and beaver can burrow into levees—even like the Sacramento River levees—and create a break that would flood all of Sacramento? And there are literally thousands of smaller levees, ditches and water control structures that could be breached and destroy hundreds of homes. Trapping used to control a lot of those varmints, but now that trapping restrictions are in place nobody does it anymore, so the proliferation of burrowing critters is endangering people more and more.

And coyotes? C’mon! Anyone who has EVER been in the outdoors knows the destruction that coyotes cause to entire wildlife populations. Sure, you will never kill them all, but if you can control their numbers in a given area, that will give other species a chance to survive and reproduce, so there will be a “balance.” Animal-rights advocates believe that the balance of nature will come about without man’s interference. Sorry, but man’s “interference” is everywhere, and will not soon change, so we do need to have a hand in wildlife management.

If folks don’t smarten up quick and begin to expand their intake of news and information beyond the quick text, tweet, email, or Face Book blog, then I don’t see much hope for survival of this country. Those with the money to overwhelm the quick news media in headlines might very well control everything that comes about in the future. Come to think about it, I believe that already happened in the last presidential election, and here in California with every election.
Late goose season
Late goose season looking to be useless for hunters

I did a huge tour of the Sacramento Valley last Thursday, Feb. 14, two days before the special late season goose hunt in the Balance of the State zone for white geese and specks, and it was a huge disappointment for me. In fact, although I’ve been anticipating it since the regular season ended, I’m not even going out.

All the way up Int. 5 north of Sacramento, to the Delevan Road turnoff for my club, I didn’t see a single grind of geese, none in the air at all, and only small pods of specks here and there, and those were isolated.

karr_gooseseason
THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS of snow geese were landing in one flooded check in the area around Robbins on Thursday before the late goose season, but it appeared it was just a “water stop” for the birds in the middle of their migration. WON PHOTO BY BILL KARR


Driving east on Delevan Road south of Sacramento Refuge, I didn’t see a single bird anywhere — not a duck or a goose. Even where there were still some flooded rice fields, there were no birds.

Coming down Four Mile Road, I finally saw some good numbers of snow geese trading back and forth from Delevan Refuge to flooded natural ponds on the west side of Four Mile, but it was all private property, so they wouldn’t do the average hunter any good.

From there, almost all the way to Marysville on Hwy. 20 I only saw decent numbers of geese on one private ranch, and they were sitting, with none in the air.

Coming down the west side of the river on backroads, I never saw a single goose in the air, or on the ground, until I got down towards Robbins, where I witnessed a dramatic sight: a “water stop” for literally thousands of snow geese!

There were thousands of thousands of the birds, and they were all in one flooded check of a rice field, and they were packed as tightly as I’ve ever seen. Flocks of geese were coming in from the south as far as I could see, and they were all heading to that one spot. This was apparently a migration heading back north, and they were seemingly stopping just for a drink of water. I have my doubts those birds would even be there the next day.

I called my friend Chuck Harrison of Western Wildlife Services, and he said there were no geese at all around the District 10 area, and he hadn’t heard of any numbers anywhere else, except possibly the Delta and south of Davis.

Guide George Kammerer of On-the-Fly Guide Service had cancelled all his late season hunts, because there were no birds at all on any of the areas he hunts. And that was the same story I heard from all over the Balance Zone.

So, what good is the late season hunt? None. Zero. Zip. Nada. In my estimation there will be little if any shooting for anyone, and it certainly won’t do anything towards bringing down the goose numbers, which was the intention of the hunt.

The Department of Fish and Wildlife might want to consider a different plan for next year. If we still need to kill more geese, how about an expanded goose-only season starting the day after regular duck season ends, when the birds are still here and moving around. Or, increase the limits again, so those who happen to get in on a good goose shooting day can kill more birds? All I know is that the late goose season, in my perspective here on the day before it’s set to begin, will be a flop for waterfowlers.
New Fish and 'Wildlife' making major moves in wrong direction
What a difference a year (or two) makes. I’ve been around this state my whole life, 66 years now, and the changes are remarkable. But I have never seen such dramatic and rapid changes like those in the California Department of Fish and Wildlife — I’ll never get used to that — from the previous Department of Fish and “Game.”

I mean, I’ve worked with hundreds of DFG folk during the past decades, from sitting on the roof of my house alongside the Salton Sea with a DFG warden using night-vision goggles following the actions of illegal corvina gillnetters, to sitting in chambers making decisions on the Upland Game Stamp committee, to infield meetings with wardens and working with DFG folks at my Youth Outdoor Sports Fairs.

And now? I hardly recognize the Department. Don’t get me wrong, I understand the need for change, but walking away from your sworn responsibilities, putting important fish and game management decisions on the back burner, and kowtowing to animal-rights groups was just never on my radar as something the DFG would do, let alone something I would have considered possible. But the DFW? Well, that’s a different story, apparently.

Take a look at this new release from Jan. 31: “ Join experienced California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) naturalists for a tour of North Table Mountain Ecological Reserve near Oroville. Tour leaders and local field experts will discuss the area's spectacular and unique wildflower blooms, beautiful vistas, volcanic geology, rare vernal pools and wildlife.” Ah, the beauty of them there wildflowers!

So, yes indeed, the DFW will be expanding some minds about the wildflowers, but what about the critters that eat those wildflowers, and the critters that eat those critters, and how hunting and wildlife management plays a critical role in the entire balance? It might come up, but I doubt it.

I have absolutely no problem with the “inclusion” of diverse groups in making decisions when it’s about something that might impact them or their organization. But you don’t bring vegans to the table when you’re discussing meat recipes, you don’t talk about changing the rules of football with ping-pong players, and you don’t want or need input from animal-rights, anti-hunting organizations when you’re discussing wildlife management. Plain and simple.

I saw the writing on the wall when past DFG Enforcement Chief Nancy Foley first started taking money from the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), a group that does nothing for dogs and cats, or wildlife, other than levy lawsuits. They are anti-hunting, and believe animals have equal rights to humans. They have no place whatsoever sitting in on anything pertaining to the Department of Fish and Game. But apparently they do with the DFW!

Now, the “new DFW” is entering another partnership, with another organization that’s not exactly pro hunting or fishing. I found it in a recent news release:

“The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Annenberg Foundation are working to bring an interpretive center to the Ballona Wetlands Ecological Reserve. Today, along with the State Coastal Conservancy (SCC) and the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission (SMBRC), CDFW and the Foundation entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to begin planning the center in hopes construction will begin in 2014.”

I was curious what might be in that MOU, and here’s part of what I found:

"The wildlife and domestic animal program and exhibits housed in the Ballona Interpretive Center would provide interpretation about animals and their habitats, including:  responsible treatment of all animals, domestic and wild; proper techniques for recreating outdoors with pets in ways that are respectful of sensitive natural ecosystems and allow humans, domestic animals, and wildlife to coexist; human-wildlife interactions and how to minimize conflicts…”

In doing a little research on the Annenberg Foundation, which we’ve all heard about, I found they have changed a bit in recent years, and according to their website: “Annenberg Foundation: At their direction, the Foundation continues its historic program focus but is expanding to include environmental stewardship, social justice and animal welfare.”

There’s northing wrong with “animal welfare”, but when they start talking about “responsible treatment of all animals, domestic and wild…”, then the definition of “responsible” comes into play. With folks like HSUS, that means no hunting at all under any circumstances. What will Annenberg Foundation’s interpretation be? And what will the DFWs role be in those displays and programs. I know how the old DFG would have handled it, but I have no idea how the “new DFW” will. Time will tell, but I think the new DFW is no friend to hunters or fishermen.

Page 1 of 5 First | Previous | Next | Last

Buy a WON Tshirt